Let’s be honest about loneliness. It isn’t just a lack of company or a bout of melancholy. It’s the lived fact that no one—not even those closest to us—will ever fully know what we’ve seen, suffered, or felt. This is not some personal defect or passing emotional phase. It’s structural. Even in the middle of a crowd, we remain alone in our own perceptual field—our own world.
When I say "our world," I don’t mean a private planet. I mean that each of us filters experience through the peculiar architecture of our own minds. Our presence brings our world into being. We don’t see reality. We see what we see. There is no such thing as objective consciousness. It has the ontological status of a unicorn: imaginable, but not real.
Loneliness, then, is the price of awakeness. It’s what we face when we stop clutching second-hand notions—religion, nationalism, spiritual slogans, gender banners, racial labels—and instead meet the terrifying fact that we don’t actually know who or what we are. But once we admit that we don’t know, we’re finally being honest. And without honesty, there’s no freedom.
Much of what we call identity is a way to wallpaper over this original solitude. We bind ourselves to race, gender, class, nation, fandom—not because we are those things, but because identifying "as" something feels like belonging. Like we’ve found our tribe. But to identify "as" is to enter a fiction. Our true identity is this aliveness, this capacity to be aware. Everything else is costume.
Race, for example, has no biological basis. The most advanced geneticists—David Reich, Craig Venter, Agustín Fuentes, Adam Rutherford—all agree: there’s no genetic sequence that makes someone "Black" or "White." There’s more genetic variation within sub-Saharan Africa than in the rest of the world combined. Race is a social construct—a powerful one, yes, with brutal consequences—but a fiction all the same. To say someone is "Black" or "White" is to participate, often unconsciously, in linguistic racism. It reinforces the very divisions we claim to oppose.
I’m not saying racism isn’t real. It is. Brutal and ongoing. And I’m not suggesting we ignore history. But when we internalize racial categories as personal identities, we perpetuate the lie. The way out isn’t to flip the script. It’s to exit the theater.
Same with gender. Human experience has always overflowed the binaries, but replacing biology entirely with identification loses the plot. Denying the body—hormones, chromosomes, the material substrate—and replacing it with endlessly mutable self-labels is fiction. Some people genuinely don’t fit neatly into male or female, and that’s fine. But gender cannot be whatever anyone says it is, detached from biology, and still remain coherent.
This does not mean I’m dismissing the struggles of those who feel marginalized. I understand why people cling to identity—for protection, community, and some sense of dignity in a society that so often withholds it.
One of the latest trends is identifying as anti-materialist, replacing naturalism with metaphysical speculation about consciousness as the primary reality. Thinkers like Donald Hoffman and Bernardo Kastrup say the physical world is just a projection of mind. These ideas wear scientific clothing but are stitched from assertion, not evidence. They appeal to those tired of materialism’s cold rigor, offering a kind of spiritualized certainty—consciousness without content, mind without matter. But this, too, can become just another belief system, another mask. To identify as an anti-materialist is often just another refusal to live with not-knowing. And that refusal, like any other, shuts the door. Awake means open, without rushing to wrap things up.
A Sufi parable tells of a man who stockpiled water after being warned that all future water would induce madness. When the rains returned, the rivers flowed again, and everyone drank—and went mad. The man, still sane, found himself alone. Finally, he drank the new water just to belong again. That’s what many of us do. We’d rather be mad together than alone in clarity.
Awakening is the refusal to drink. It’s the choice to live without refuge in race, gender, religion, politics, or metaphysical identity.
Awake doesn’t mean that suffering vanishes. It means meeting suffering without disguise. It’s not an easy path. You may find yourself friendless. You may feel the wind blow through the hole where identity used to be. But in that emptiness, something else becomes possible: a direct, unfiltered encounter with what is. No names. No masks. No certainties. Just aliveness.
That is what I mean by awake. That is what I mean by Depending On No-Thing.
Yes. I am in London at the moment and it's been a beautiful warm spring day here. I went to a remarkable exhibition at The Tate Modern; humans expressing ourselves in the midst of our certain march towards desolation. Joy inside the pain. As we left there were a group of scientolgists and a group of Christians selling their wares: humans bonding around the magical stories we tell around the fire as the hyenas howl in the distance.
The best part of this is the recognition there’s always a next flavour of illusion, next final instalment, the next secret, will be the one to do the unveiling for the “awakening.”
In my case by the time I found your book, post-45, unknown and undiagnosed autistic, I went searching high and low and the more I learnt the less I understood.
The narratives I was looking to solve my problems were just that, convenient narratives.
It wasn’t till I realized we’re all just making this shit up as we go, our brains busy predicting what actions will be productive and controlling our input/outputs and making up the narrative post hoc.
We can’t be anything we are not, and never have, yet we cling to the notion of self-autonomy, self control, self… self… self… molecules following the forces of thermodynamics, collections of gene expressions, and random probabilities of the quantum world… yet the most incredible forces in the universe of attraction reside here within us in the strong and weak forces of the nuclear world.
At what level of abstraction do you stop taking control?
Rhetorical. What suits you is the answer. You’ll make up what you believe and that will be that.
We know now the brain is PREDICTING, not ANTICIPATING and REACTING!
You know those times in the shower when you get a killer comeback to burn someone for what they said, but that was yesterday at lunch… ya that’s kind like how your brain works all the time.
Great post, great books!